<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 300 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239123</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the original judgment regarding a club&#039;s service tax liability, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive legal analysis. The Court directed a fresh consideration of the case, taking into account the 2005 amendment in Section 65 of the Finance Act and relevant legal provisions. Both parties were granted the opportunity to present their arguments anew to ensure a more informed decision on the club&#039;s service tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 17:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 300 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239123</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the original judgment regarding a club&#039;s service tax liability, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive legal analysis. The Court directed a fresh consideration of the case, taking into account the 2005 amendment in Section 65 of the Finance Act and relevant legal provisions. Both parties were granted the opportunity to present their arguments anew to ensure a more informed decision on the club&#039;s service tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>