<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 294 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239117</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the Order-in-Original denying Service Tax credit to the appellant and remanded the case back to the adjudicating authority to await clarification from the Central Board of Excise &amp;amp; Customs on jurisdictional issues. The jurisdictional question of whether the case should be decided by the Raigad Commissioner or the Commissioner of Service Tax in Mumbai was deemed crucial, leading to the decision to reconsider the matter based on the outcome of the reference, without expressing any opinion on the case&#039;s merits. The appeals were allowed for remand, and stay petitions were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 14:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 294 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239117</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the Order-in-Original denying Service Tax credit to the appellant and remanded the case back to the adjudicating authority to await clarification from the Central Board of Excise &amp;amp; Customs on jurisdictional issues. The jurisdictional question of whether the case should be decided by the Raigad Commissioner or the Commissioner of Service Tax in Mumbai was deemed crucial, leading to the decision to reconsider the matter based on the outcome of the reference, without expressing any opinion on the case&#039;s merits. The appeals were allowed for remand, and stay petitions were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>