<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 580 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158766</link>
    <description>The Act&#039;s definition of &quot;local area&quot; was treated as exhaustive, so the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board itself was not a local authority; however, entry tax could still apply where goods entered a local area defined by the statute. A later retrospective re-enactment with a repeal and saving clause preserved notifications issued under the amended charging provision, so lapse of the Ordinance did not invalidate them. A corrigendum that merely supplied an omitted rate was held to be a rectificatory exercise, not a fresh levy, and did not require prior legislative placement. The inserted schedule entry was found intra vires as it carried out the statutory scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 17:47:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 580 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158766</link>
      <description>The Act&#039;s definition of &quot;local area&quot; was treated as exhaustive, so the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board itself was not a local authority; however, entry tax could still apply where goods entered a local area defined by the statute. A later retrospective re-enactment with a repeal and saving clause preserved notifications issued under the amended charging provision, so lapse of the Ordinance did not invalidate them. A corrigendum that merely supplied an omitted rate was held to be a rectificatory exercise, not a fresh levy, and did not require prior legislative placement. The inserted schedule entry was found intra vires as it carried out the statutory scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>