<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (11) TMI 428 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158742</link>
    <description>An appellate authority, while hearing an assessee&#039;s appeal, cannot enhance assessment or penalty or withdraw relief already granted unless the governing statute expressly confers that power or the department has filed an appeal or cross-objections. Section 14B of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 allowed the tribunal to pass such order as it thought fit, but did not authorise a wholesale reversal of first appellate relief in the department&#039;s absence. The order remanding the matter in toto on the assessee&#039;s appeal alone was therefore unsustainable, and the relief granted below was restored, with remand limited only to the remaining transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 15:04:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (11) TMI 428 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158742</link>
      <description>An appellate authority, while hearing an assessee&#039;s appeal, cannot enhance assessment or penalty or withdraw relief already granted unless the governing statute expressly confers that power or the department has filed an appeal or cross-objections. Section 14B of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 allowed the tribunal to pass such order as it thought fit, but did not authorise a wholesale reversal of first appellate relief in the department&#039;s absence. The order remanding the matter in toto on the assessee&#039;s appeal alone was therefore unsustainable, and the relief granted below was restored, with remand limited only to the remaining transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>