<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 504 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158716</link>
    <description>Seizure of notified goods at a check-post under section 70(1) is sustainable where the prescribed permit is not produced within the statutory detention period. A separate detention notice or show-cause notice is not required where reasonable time to produce the permit has already been afforded. Rule 207(1) applies criminal procedure requirements only as far as possible; witness requirements for searches in closed places do not strictly govern an open check-post seizure where the goods&#039; identity and quantity are undisputed and no prejudice is shown. Statutory seizure for non-production of a permit does not, without more, infringe freedom of trade under article 301 or exceed jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 18:55:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 504 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158716</link>
      <description>Seizure of notified goods at a check-post under section 70(1) is sustainable where the prescribed permit is not produced within the statutory detention period. A separate detention notice or show-cause notice is not required where reasonable time to produce the permit has already been afforded. Rule 207(1) applies criminal procedure requirements only as far as possible; witness requirements for searches in closed places do not strictly govern an open check-post seizure where the goods&#039; identity and quantity are undisputed and no prejudice is shown. Statutory seizure for non-production of a permit does not, without more, infringe freedom of trade under article 301 or exceed jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158716</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>