https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239114 A stay order requiring deposit of the entire duty liability was modified after the earlier direction was noted to have been passed ex parte and the appellant showed financial hardship through loss in its balance sheet. The tribunal balanced those factors against prima facie observations in the connected matter and found full pre-deposit excessive. The pre-deposit requirement was therefore recalibrated, and the appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 15 lakhs within eight weeks, with the appeals to be heard on merits only after compliance. en-us Mon, 15 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Nov 2013 10:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239114 A stay order requiring deposit of the entire duty liability was modified after the earlier direction was noted to have been passed ex parte and the appellant showed financial hardship through loss in its balance sheet. The tribunal balanced those factors against prima facie observations in the connected matter and found full pre-deposit excessive. The pre-deposit requirement was therefore recalibrated, and the appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 15 lakhs within eight weeks, with the appeals to be heard on merits only after compliance. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 15 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239114