<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 270 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239093</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in all three issues, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal in its entirety. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering the factual circumstances and evidence in assessing undisclosed income, rejecting book results, and determining partner&#039;s remuneration in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 08:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 270 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239093</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in all three issues, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal in its entirety. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering the factual circumstances and evidence in assessing undisclosed income, rejecting book results, and determining partner&#039;s remuneration in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>