https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239086 The Court held that it had jurisdiction to entertain the appeal filed by the Commissioner of Customs challenging the order passed by the South Zonal Bench of CESTAT at Chennai. The Court dismissed the review application with no costs, concluding that the President of CESTAT did not have the jurisdiction to unilaterally transfer the case from the Mumbai Bench to the Chennai Bench through an administrative order, as it must be done through judicial orders. en-us Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Nov 2013 11:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239086 The Court held that it had jurisdiction to entertain the appeal filed by the Commissioner of Customs challenging the order passed by the South Zonal Bench of CESTAT at Chennai. The Court dismissed the review application with no costs, concluding that the President of CESTAT did not have the jurisdiction to unilaterally transfer the case from the Mumbai Bench to the Chennai Bench through an administrative order, as it must be done through judicial orders. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239086