<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 689 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158714</link>
    <description>An assessment based solely on one day&#039;s sales was found unsustainable where the Revenue did not independently establish any omission or suppression. The Court held that extrapolating one day sales to the entire year was not a scientific or legally reliable method, particularly without accounting for normal, festive, seasonal, or other trading variations. The Tribunal&#039;s view that the estimated addition was unjustified was upheld, and the consequential penalty could not survive because the underlying addition failed. The appellate authorities&#039; modified assessment was therefore left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334605" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 689 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158714</link>
      <description>An assessment based solely on one day&#039;s sales was found unsustainable where the Revenue did not independently establish any omission or suppression. The Court held that extrapolating one day sales to the entire year was not a scientific or legally reliable method, particularly without accounting for normal, festive, seasonal, or other trading variations. The Tribunal&#039;s view that the estimated addition was unjustified was upheld, and the consequential penalty could not survive because the underlying addition failed. The appellate authorities&#039; modified assessment was therefore left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158714</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>