<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 599 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158708</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, establishing that the previous year followed by the firm should be considered for assessing a partner&#039;s share income, as per the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This decision clarified that the assessment of share income should align with the firm&#039;s previous year, even if it differs from the partner&#039;s individual previous year for other income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 18:07:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 599 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158708</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, establishing that the previous year followed by the firm should be considered for assessing a partner&#039;s share income, as per the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This decision clarified that the assessment of share income should align with the firm&#039;s previous year, even if it differs from the partner&#039;s individual previous year for other income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>