<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 464 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158705</link>
    <description>The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the writ petition concerning exemption for retreaded tires, ruling that the sale was of materials used in the process, not the retreaded tire itself. The small-scale industrial unit was deemed ineligible for the exemption without a sale of the goods produced. The petitioner was given four weeks to file objections to the proposition notices, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 17:39:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 464 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158705</link>
      <description>The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the writ petition concerning exemption for retreaded tires, ruling that the sale was of materials used in the process, not the retreaded tire itself. The small-scale industrial unit was deemed ineligible for the exemption without a sale of the goods produced. The petitioner was given four weeks to file objections to the proposition notices, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>