<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (1) TMI 487 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158692</link>
    <description>Revisional power under section 40 is limited to correcting illegality or impropriety in an existing order, and it cannot be used to reopen a concluded appellate order merely because a later tribunal ruling takes a different view. An order made in accordance with the law prevailing at the time does not become illegal or improper retrospectively. The text also notes that upsetting such finalized matters would create uncertainty and endless reopening of closed cases. On that basis, the revisional authority was not justified in interfering, and the Tribunal&#039;s setting aside of the revisional order was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 16:29:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (1) TMI 487 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158692</link>
      <description>Revisional power under section 40 is limited to correcting illegality or impropriety in an existing order, and it cannot be used to reopen a concluded appellate order merely because a later tribunal ruling takes a different view. An order made in accordance with the law prevailing at the time does not become illegal or improper retrospectively. The text also notes that upsetting such finalized matters would create uncertainty and endless reopening of closed cases. On that basis, the revisional authority was not justified in interfering, and the Tribunal&#039;s setting aside of the revisional order was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>