<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 437 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158689</link>
    <description>Section 78 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 authorises interception and inspection of goods in transit by the empowered officer, and supports seizure and penalty where prescribed documents are absent, false, or forged. A circular dated 11 October 1995 could not curtail that statutory power or create immunity from action under the Act. The record showed notice, hearing, and an explanation from the transport company&#039;s representative before penalty was imposed, so the enquiry requirement was satisfied. Transfer of the file under section 41 was also upheld as an administrative step causing no shown prejudice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 16:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 437 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158689</link>
      <description>Section 78 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 authorises interception and inspection of goods in transit by the empowered officer, and supports seizure and penalty where prescribed documents are absent, false, or forged. A circular dated 11 October 1995 could not curtail that statutory power or create immunity from action under the Act. The record showed notice, hearing, and an explanation from the transport company&#039;s representative before penalty was imposed, so the enquiry requirement was satisfied. Transfer of the file under section 41 was also upheld as an administrative step causing no shown prejudice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>