https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158687 Writ interference was considered unwarranted in a tax seizure dispute involving alleged evasion, because the genuineness of transport and sale documents raised factual questions for the statutory authorities, the goods and truck had already been released on security, and the Act provided an effective alternative remedy. The challenge to the seizure and notice was therefore declined. A separate amendment application seeking to question the constitutional validity of the penalty provision was rejected as premature, since it was moved after pleadings were complete and the matter had been argued at length, though the petitioner was left free to raise the vires issue before the appropriate Bench later. en-us Mon, 13 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Nov 2013 15:23:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158687 Writ interference was considered unwarranted in a tax seizure dispute involving alleged evasion, because the genuineness of transport and sale documents raised factual questions for the statutory authorities, the goods and truck had already been released on security, and the Act provided an effective alternative remedy. The challenge to the seizure and notice was therefore declined. A separate amendment application seeking to question the constitutional validity of the penalty provision was rejected as premature, since it was moved after pleadings were complete and the matter had been argued at length, though the petitioner was left free to raise the vires issue before the appropriate Bench later. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 13 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158687