<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 583 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158686</link>
    <description>Writ jurisdiction was held inappropriate where assessment orders under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act were passed by a competent assessing authority and the objections raised turned largely on factual and mixed questions, including the lease arrangement, royalty payments, and whether packing and forwarding charges formed part of sale price. Those matters were capable of examination in the statutory appellate hierarchy, and the existence of an effective appeal under the Act, followed by further appellate remedy, meant the petitioners had to pursue the alternate statutory route. The writ petitions were therefore dismissed as not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 15:47:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 583 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158686</link>
      <description>Writ jurisdiction was held inappropriate where assessment orders under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act were passed by a competent assessing authority and the objections raised turned largely on factual and mixed questions, including the lease arrangement, royalty payments, and whether packing and forwarding charges formed part of sale price. Those matters were capable of examination in the statutory appellate hierarchy, and the existence of an effective appeal under the Act, followed by further appellate remedy, meant the petitioners had to pursue the alternate statutory route. The writ petitions were therefore dismissed as not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158686</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>