<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 553 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158675</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the order of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal imposing a penalty on a dealer for issuing sales bills, amounting to Rs.46,51,060 within two days. The Court upheld the decision of the appellate authority and revisional authority, emphasizing the importance of concurrent findings by these bodies. It noted the dealer&#039;s satisfactory storage capacity and documentary evidence of stock and sales, concluding that there was no basis to interfere with the factual findings supported by evidence. The Court aligned with a previous decision, finding no merit in the Government&#039;s challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 13:19:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 553 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158675</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the order of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal imposing a penalty on a dealer for issuing sales bills, amounting to Rs.46,51,060 within two days. The Court upheld the decision of the appellate authority and revisional authority, emphasizing the importance of concurrent findings by these bodies. It noted the dealer&#039;s satisfactory storage capacity and documentary evidence of stock and sales, concluding that there was no basis to interfere with the factual findings supported by evidence. The Court aligned with a previous decision, finding no merit in the Government&#039;s challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>