<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 261 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239084</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a registered society, in a case concerning exemption from sales tax for rice manufacturing. The court held that the exemption granted to the petitioner for the assessment years 2002-03 and 2003-04 was valid, as the notifications referred to the processing of cereals, including rice, and not just paddy. The court determined that the exclusion of rice from paddy in a subsequent notification could not be applied retrospectively, rendering the re-assessment orders for those years illegal. The petitioner was relieved of the trade tax liability for the mentioned years, except partially for 2004-05, with the option to appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 12:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 261 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239084</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a registered society, in a case concerning exemption from sales tax for rice manufacturing. The court held that the exemption granted to the petitioner for the assessment years 2002-03 and 2003-04 was valid, as the notifications referred to the processing of cereals, including rice, and not just paddy. The court determined that the exclusion of rice from paddy in a subsequent notification could not be applied retrospectively, rendering the re-assessment orders for those years illegal. The petitioner was relieved of the trade tax liability for the mentioned years, except partially for 2004-05, with the option to appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>