https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239071 The tribunal found the appellant liable for mis-declaration of MRP on imported bulbs, directing a deposit of Rs. 15 lakhs within six weeks to address revenue prejudice. The appellant's objections regarding detained goods were dismissed, with the tribunal requiring compliance with the deposit order for an expedited appeal hearing. The stay application was disposed of, contingent on complying with the deposit order, emphasizing adherence to order conditions for maintaining the stay and pursuing the appeals effectively. en-us Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Nov 2013 11:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239071 The tribunal found the appellant liable for mis-declaration of MRP on imported bulbs, directing a deposit of Rs. 15 lakhs within six weeks to address revenue prejudice. The appellant's objections regarding detained goods were dismissed, with the tribunal requiring compliance with the deposit order for an expedited appeal hearing. The stay application was disposed of, contingent on complying with the deposit order, emphasizing adherence to order conditions for maintaining the stay and pursuing the appeals effectively. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239071