https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239063 The court held that writ petitions are generally not maintainable against interim orders of CESTAT when statutory remedies exist. It applied the interpretation from Raj Kumar Shivhare's case to Central Excise Act and Customs Act, allowing appeals against all orders, including interim ones. Sections 35G and 130 permit appeals against any order, encompassing interim orders. The court dismissed the writ petitions, advising appeals under statutory provisions, and ordered maintaining the status quo for three weeks for appeal filing. en-us Wed, 30 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Jul 2014 12:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239063 The court held that writ petitions are generally not maintainable against interim orders of CESTAT when statutory remedies exist. It applied the interpretation from Raj Kumar Shivhare's case to Central Excise Act and Customs Act, allowing appeals against all orders, including interim ones. Sections 35G and 130 permit appeals against any order, encompassing interim orders. The court dismissed the writ petitions, advising appeals under statutory provisions, and ordered maintaining the status quo for three weeks for appeal filing. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 30 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239063