<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 234 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239057</link>
    <description>In a valuation dispute over semi-finished excavator parts cleared to sister concerns on stock transfer basis, the Tribunal accepted that excess duty paid in some years could be adjusted against alleged short payment in other years for the limited purpose of interim relief. On that basis, it found a prima facie case for complete waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty under Rule 8 valuation, and granted stay of recovery during the appeal. The operative point was that the existing record supported adjustment of cross-period excess duty at the interim stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2013 11:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 234 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239057</link>
      <description>In a valuation dispute over semi-finished excavator parts cleared to sister concerns on stock transfer basis, the Tribunal accepted that excess duty paid in some years could be adjusted against alleged short payment in other years for the limited purpose of interim relief. On that basis, it found a prima facie case for complete waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty under Rule 8 valuation, and granted stay of recovery during the appeal. The operative point was that the existing record supported adjustment of cross-period excess duty at the interim stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>