https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239055 The case involved allegations of clandestine removal, defrauding Revenue, and misuse of Cenvat credit. The adjudication process was challenged for violating the principle of natural justice due to lack of document disclosure and cross-examination. The court upheld the excise duty demand based on incriminating evidence, finding the appellant involved in clandestine activities. Penalties were imposed, including a substantial deposit to protect Revenue's interest, highlighting the seriousness of the violations uncovered during the proceedings. en-us Mon, 15 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Nov 2013 12:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239055 The case involved allegations of clandestine removal, defrauding Revenue, and misuse of Cenvat credit. The adjudication process was challenged for violating the principle of natural justice due to lack of document disclosure and cross-examination. The court upheld the excise duty demand based on incriminating evidence, finding the appellant involved in clandestine activities. Penalties were imposed, including a substantial deposit to protect Revenue's interest, highlighting the seriousness of the violations uncovered during the proceedings. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 15 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239055