https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239033 The Tribunal confirmed the additions based on entries in the crystal college book, rejecting claims of double taxation. The penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for Dr. P.K. Asokan was remanded for reassessment to ensure a fair opportunity for explanation. The revenue's appeal for Dr. Nasser Yousuf was allowed, while appeals for Dr. P.K. Asokan and Dr. Mrs. Anitha Asokan were dismissed. The penalty issue for Dr. P.K. Asokan was remanded for fresh consideration. en-us Wed, 29 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Oct 2013 18:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239033 The Tribunal confirmed the additions based on entries in the crystal college book, rejecting claims of double taxation. The penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for Dr. P.K. Asokan was remanded for reassessment to ensure a fair opportunity for explanation. The revenue's appeal for Dr. Nasser Yousuf was allowed, while appeals for Dr. P.K. Asokan and Dr. Mrs. Anitha Asokan were dismissed. The penalty issue for Dr. P.K. Asokan was remanded for fresh consideration. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 29 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239033