<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1231 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158664</link>
    <description>A Commissioner&#039;s clarification under Section 28-A(3) of the TNGST Act is binding on subordinate authorities, and its effect on earlier assessment years must be examined on the relevant facts. Star anise seeds had been treated variously as a residual item, a country drug, or a First Schedule item, but a later clarification placed them under Item 2 of Part B of the First Schedule. Because the applicability of that clarification to the earlier years required factual determination, the Tribunal&#039;s classification could not safely stand. The matter was remitted to the Assessing Authority to decide whether the petitioners could claim the benefit of the clarification and to re-determine the tax rate in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1231 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158664</link>
      <description>A Commissioner&#039;s clarification under Section 28-A(3) of the TNGST Act is binding on subordinate authorities, and its effect on earlier assessment years must be examined on the relevant facts. Star anise seeds had been treated variously as a residual item, a country drug, or a First Schedule item, but a later clarification placed them under Item 2 of Part B of the First Schedule. Because the applicability of that clarification to the earlier years required factual determination, the Tribunal&#039;s classification could not safely stand. The matter was remitted to the Assessing Authority to decide whether the petitioners could claim the benefit of the clarification and to re-determine the tax rate in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>