<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 502 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158663</link>
    <description>Writ petitions challenging sales tax assessment orders were not entertained because the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 provided an efficacious statutory appeal remedy with a further appellate hierarchy. The assessee was relegated to that appellate route, and the Court directed that if appeals were filed within 15 days, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner should hear and decide them on merits in accordance with law without examining limitation. The limitation objection was therefore kept out of consideration for appeals presented within the directed period, and the challenge to the assessment orders was left to be pursued before the appellate authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2013 16:00:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 502 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158663</link>
      <description>Writ petitions challenging sales tax assessment orders were not entertained because the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 provided an efficacious statutory appeal remedy with a further appellate hierarchy. The assessee was relegated to that appellate route, and the Court directed that if appeals were filed within 15 days, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner should hear and decide them on merits in accordance with law without examining limitation. The limitation objection was therefore kept out of consideration for appeals presented within the directed period, and the challenge to the assessment orders was left to be pursued before the appellate authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158663</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>