<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 207 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239030</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s order, ruling in favor of the assessee and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of the addition on account of low GP for the assessment year 2006-07. The Tribunal found that the AO&#039;s decision was based on a misinterpretation of facts, as the assessee maintained detailed stock records and provided explanations for the decrease in GP ratio. The Tribunal accepted the CIT(A)&#039;s reasoning that the increase in purchase price did not directly impact sales prices, and different product margins varied. The audit report also did not raise concerns about stock register maintenance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Nov 2013 12:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 207 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239030</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s order, ruling in favor of the assessee and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of the addition on account of low GP for the assessment year 2006-07. The Tribunal found that the AO&#039;s decision was based on a misinterpretation of facts, as the assessee maintained detailed stock records and provided explanations for the decrease in GP ratio. The Tribunal accepted the CIT(A)&#039;s reasoning that the increase in purchase price did not directly impact sales prices, and different product margins varied. The audit report also did not raise concerns about stock register maintenance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239030</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>