<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 197 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239020</link>
    <description>The Tribunal, guided by the Bombay High Court&#039;s decision in ABG Heavy Industries Ltd., ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction under section 80IA(4) for the relevant assessment years. The Tribunal emphasized the clarificatory nature of the amendment to section 80IA(4) and the importance of interpreting tax provisions in line with legislative intent. The decision was rendered on 28.2.2013, directing the Assessing Officer to permit the deduction for the projects in question for both assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 11:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 197 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239020</link>
      <description>The Tribunal, guided by the Bombay High Court&#039;s decision in ABG Heavy Industries Ltd., ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction under section 80IA(4) for the relevant assessment years. The Tribunal emphasized the clarificatory nature of the amendment to section 80IA(4) and the importance of interpreting tax provisions in line with legislative intent. The decision was rendered on 28.2.2013, directing the Assessing Officer to permit the deduction for the projects in question for both assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>