<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 191 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239014</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the short-term capital gains should be treated as capital gains and not as business income. The cross objection by the assessee was dismissed as it became irrelevant following the primary decision. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on a thorough analysis of the assessee&#039;s transaction patterns, holding periods, and past treatment of similar gains, confirming the assessee&#039;s status as an investor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Nov 2013 09:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 191 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239014</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the short-term capital gains should be treated as capital gains and not as business income. The cross objection by the assessee was dismissed as it became irrelevant following the primary decision. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on a thorough analysis of the assessee&#039;s transaction patterns, holding periods, and past treatment of similar gains, confirming the assessee&#039;s status as an investor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>