<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 168 - ITAT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238991</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow deductions under sections 80IB(4) and 35(1)(i), dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal on both grounds. The Tribunal found that the assessee qualified for the deductions as its unit was located in an industrially backward State and the research expenditure was related to its own business. The cross-objection by the assessee was dismissed as it became infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2013 12:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 168 - ITAT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238991</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow deductions under sections 80IB(4) and 35(1)(i), dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal on both grounds. The Tribunal found that the assessee qualified for the deductions as its unit was located in an industrially backward State and the research expenditure was related to its own business. The cross-objection by the assessee was dismissed as it became infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>