<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 167 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238990</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the deduction under section 54 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal confirmed that the term &quot;due date&quot; includes the extended filing date under section 139(4), thereby validating the assessee&#039;s investment made after the initial due date. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the eligibility of the assessee for the deduction of Rs. 40 lakhs under section 54.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2013 12:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 167 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238990</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the deduction under section 54 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal confirmed that the term &quot;due date&quot; includes the extended filing date under section 139(4), thereby validating the assessee&#039;s investment made after the initial due date. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the eligibility of the assessee for the deduction of Rs. 40 lakhs under section 54.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>