<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 139 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238962</link>
    <description>The ITAT partly allowed the appeal, granting relief to the assessee on issues including deduction u/s 80HHC, employees&#039; contribution to Provident Fund, interest on motor car loans, motor car expenses, and depreciation on motor cars. However, disallowances of foreign travel expenses and business promotion and telephone expenses were upheld due to lack of business purpose evidence. The ITAT&#039;s decision was based on reconciling figures, legal principles, and precedents, resulting in a mixed outcome for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 18:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 139 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238962</link>
      <description>The ITAT partly allowed the appeal, granting relief to the assessee on issues including deduction u/s 80HHC, employees&#039; contribution to Provident Fund, interest on motor car loans, motor car expenses, and depreciation on motor cars. However, disallowances of foreign travel expenses and business promotion and telephone expenses were upheld due to lack of business purpose evidence. The ITAT&#039;s decision was based on reconciling figures, legal principles, and precedents, resulting in a mixed outcome for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>