<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 134 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238957</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes on both issues. The Tribunal remitted the matters back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration in light of relevant legal decisions. The disallowance of delay in payment of E.P.F. and under section 40(a)(ia) was challenged successfully, leading to a reassessment of the issues by the Assessing Officer based on the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2013 06:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 134 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238957</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes on both issues. The Tribunal remitted the matters back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration in light of relevant legal decisions. The disallowance of delay in payment of E.P.F. and under section 40(a)(ia) was challenged successfully, leading to a reassessment of the issues by the Assessing Officer based on the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>