https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158656 A writ challenge to initiation of reassessment under sales tax law was treated as premature because the statute provided a complete machinery for jurisdictional objections, reassessment, appeal and further remedies. The Court held that where the taxing authority had recorded material indicating escaped sales or purchases and the petitioner could contest jurisdiction before that authority, Article 226 should not be used to bypass the statutory process. Writ interference at the stage of initiation or pending assessment was therefore unwarranted, and the challenge to reassessment failed. en-us Tue, 25 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Nov 2013 15:30:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158656 A writ challenge to initiation of reassessment under sales tax law was treated as premature because the statute provided a complete machinery for jurisdictional objections, reassessment, appeal and further remedies. The Court held that where the taxing authority had recorded material indicating escaped sales or purchases and the petitioner could contest jurisdiction before that authority, Article 226 should not be used to bypass the statutory process. Writ interference at the stage of initiation or pending assessment was therefore unwarranted, and the challenge to reassessment failed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 25 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158656