<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 501 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158652</link>
    <description>An unqualified commercial description in a sales tax entry is to be applied according to the trade meaning of the goods, not their ultimate end-use. The Tribunal held that the expression &quot;lacquer&quot; in entry 51 of Part A of Schedule IV was wide enough to cover all goods answering that description, and that ejusdem generis could not narrow its plain scope. On the material, including the applicant&#039;s literature, transport documents and trade certificate, Corial Lacquer FM was known in trade parlance as lacquer, even though used in the leather industry as a finishing material. It was therefore correctly classified as lacquer, and the seizures for non-production of the sales tax permit were valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2013 15:08:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 501 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158652</link>
      <description>An unqualified commercial description in a sales tax entry is to be applied according to the trade meaning of the goods, not their ultimate end-use. The Tribunal held that the expression &quot;lacquer&quot; in entry 51 of Part A of Schedule IV was wide enough to cover all goods answering that description, and that ejusdem generis could not narrow its plain scope. On the material, including the applicant&#039;s literature, transport documents and trade certificate, Corial Lacquer FM was known in trade parlance as lacquer, even though used in the leather industry as a finishing material. It was therefore correctly classified as lacquer, and the seizures for non-production of the sales tax permit were valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>