<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 510 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158643</link>
    <description>Turnover from water charges and from the supply of ridges and covers was held taxable because the assessee transferred property in goods for consideration in the course of business, bringing the transactions within the statutory definition of sale. By contrast, the cost of tender schedules supplied to intending allottees was not exigible to sales tax because the supply was compulsory and did not amount to trading in that commodity or an incidental business of buying and selling it. The revision succeeded only on the tender-schedule issue, and the tax finding on water charges and ridges and covers was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2013 14:15:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 510 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158643</link>
      <description>Turnover from water charges and from the supply of ridges and covers was held taxable because the assessee transferred property in goods for consideration in the course of business, bringing the transactions within the statutory definition of sale. By contrast, the cost of tender schedules supplied to intending allottees was not exigible to sales tax because the supply was compulsory and did not amount to trading in that commodity or an incidental business of buying and selling it. The revision succeeded only on the tender-schedule issue, and the tax finding on water charges and ridges and covers was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>