<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 104 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238927</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted a waiver of the demand for CENVAT Credit along with interest and penalty, allowing the stay petition during the appeal process. The Tribunal found that the Applicant maintained a common pool account for availing CENVAT Credit against inputs, capital goods, and input services, and that there is no requirement for separate credit accounts for manufacturing and service activities based on precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2013 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 104 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238927</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted a waiver of the demand for CENVAT Credit along with interest and penalty, allowing the stay petition during the appeal process. The Tribunal found that the Applicant maintained a common pool account for availing CENVAT Credit against inputs, capital goods, and input services, and that there is no requirement for separate credit accounts for manufacturing and service activities based on precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>