https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238913 The appellant's request for rectification of an apparent mistake in the final order was dismissed by the bench, upholding the lower appellate authority's decision that the order-in-original was lawfully served on the appellant on 17.2.2004. Despite the appellant's arguments challenging the date of communication, the bench found no grounds for review. The tribunal emphasized the importance of timely communication and rejected the appellant's attempt to introduce additional evidence through a ROM application. The final order was upheld, and the appellant's appeal was ultimately dismissed. en-us Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Nov 2013 12:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238913 The appellant's request for rectification of an apparent mistake in the final order was dismissed by the bench, upholding the lower appellate authority's decision that the order-in-original was lawfully served on the appellant on 17.2.2004. Despite the appellant's arguments challenging the date of communication, the bench found no grounds for review. The tribunal emphasized the importance of timely communication and rejected the appellant's attempt to introduce additional evidence through a ROM application. The final order was upheld, and the appellant's appeal was ultimately dismissed. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238913