<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 74 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238897</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the notice issued under Section 148(2) for reopening the assessment but set aside the adoption of the cost of acquisition as on 01.04.1981 for computing capital gains. The matter was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination, with instructions to consider additional evidence and provide the assessee an opportunity to be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2013 11:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 74 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238897</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the notice issued under Section 148(2) for reopening the assessment but set aside the adoption of the cost of acquisition as on 01.04.1981 for computing capital gains. The matter was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination, with instructions to consider additional evidence and provide the assessee an opportunity to be heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>