<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 70 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238893</link>
    <description>The court held that the reopening of the assessment under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act was not justified as there was no failure to disclose material facts by the petitioner. The court found that the reopening was based on a change of opinion, which is impermissible. Consequently, the court set aside the notice initiating the reassessment and all related proceedings, including the order disposing of objections. The writ petition was allowed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2013 10:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 70 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238893</link>
      <description>The court held that the reopening of the assessment under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act was not justified as there was no failure to disclose material facts by the petitioner. The court found that the reopening was based on a change of opinion, which is impermissible. Consequently, the court set aside the notice initiating the reassessment and all related proceedings, including the order disposing of objections. The writ petition was allowed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>