<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 55 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238878</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions made by the Assessing Officer due to the lack of incriminating documents, higher overall disclosure by the group, and absence of corroborative evidence for statements recorded during the search. The appeals by the Revenue were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 55 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238878</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions made by the Assessing Officer due to the lack of incriminating documents, higher overall disclosure by the group, and absence of corroborative evidence for statements recorded during the search. The appeals by the Revenue were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>