<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 466 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158590</link>
    <description>Purchase tax could not be levied on building materials bought for repair, renewal and maintenance of the factory building, because such purchases were not made in the course of the assessee&#039;s manufacturing business; the levy was therefore unsustainable. Penalty was correctly attracted for delayed payment of monthly tax and failure to furnish returns on time, because the prescribed payment schedule in the Rules formed part of the statutory obligation, and default in that schedule fell within the penalty provision. Cylinders were treated as packing materials and taxable at the lower rate, as they functioned as containers for gases and were not excluded merely because they were returnable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 12:52:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 466 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158590</link>
      <description>Purchase tax could not be levied on building materials bought for repair, renewal and maintenance of the factory building, because such purchases were not made in the course of the assessee&#039;s manufacturing business; the levy was therefore unsustainable. Penalty was correctly attracted for delayed payment of monthly tax and failure to furnish returns on time, because the prescribed payment schedule in the Rules formed part of the statutory obligation, and default in that schedule fell within the penalty provision. Cylinders were treated as packing materials and taxable at the lower rate, as they functioned as containers for gases and were not excluded merely because they were returnable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>