https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238870 The Tribunal granted the stay petition, ruling that the notification providing for the refund claim was not applicable to the period in question due to the subsequent inclusion of the service. This decision favored the Revenue's argument and upheld the stay of the Commissioner (Appeals) order directing the processing and sanctioning of the refund claim under Notification 17/2009. en-us Fri, 05 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Nov 2013 12:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238870 The Tribunal granted the stay petition, ruling that the notification providing for the refund claim was not applicable to the period in question due to the subsequent inclusion of the service. This decision favored the Revenue's argument and upheld the stay of the Commissioner (Appeals) order directing the processing and sanctioning of the refund claim under Notification 17/2009. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 05 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238870