<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 42 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238865</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the Applicant&#039;s Stay Petition, waiving the pre-deposit of Rs.52,36,222/- demanded under Sections 78 and 77 of the Act, along with interest and penalties. The services provided for road construction to the Government of Sikkim were considered exempt from service tax. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a detailed examination of the contracts and services provided, indicating this analysis would occur during the final hearing. Recovery of the demanded amount was stayed during the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 11:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334115" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 42 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238865</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the Applicant&#039;s Stay Petition, waiving the pre-deposit of Rs.52,36,222/- demanded under Sections 78 and 77 of the Act, along with interest and penalties. The services provided for road construction to the Government of Sikkim were considered exempt from service tax. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a detailed examination of the contracts and services provided, indicating this analysis would occur during the final hearing. Recovery of the demanded amount was stayed during the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>