<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 38 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238861</link>
    <description>Transaction value under Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 read with Rule 4 of the Customs (Valuation of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007 must be accepted unless valid reasons justify rejection and sequential reassessment under Rules 5 to 9. Allegations of a cartel and reliance on journal prices were insufficient where no material was produced to prove collusion or show that declared prices were below contemporaneous import values. Journal prices are not a prescribed valuation method, and no reliable foundation was laid for immediate enhancement. On that prima facie basis, interim relief was justified, and waiver of pre-deposit with stay of recovery was granted pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 13:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 38 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238861</link>
      <description>Transaction value under Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 read with Rule 4 of the Customs (Valuation of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007 must be accepted unless valid reasons justify rejection and sequential reassessment under Rules 5 to 9. Allegations of a cartel and reliance on journal prices were insufficient where no material was produced to prove collusion or show that declared prices were below contemporaneous import values. Journal prices are not a prescribed valuation method, and no reliable foundation was laid for immediate enhancement. On that prima facie basis, interim relief was justified, and waiver of pre-deposit with stay of recovery was granted pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>