https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238860 The court dismissed the writ petition seeking the release of cash seized by Central Excise Authorities, citing the petitioner's delays, failure to comply with procedural requirements, and absence before the Adjudicating Authority as key reasons for the decision. Despite the Commissioner not rejecting the cash release application, the court declined to intervene due to the petitioner's prolonged inaction and non-filing of a reply to the show cause notice issued in 2008. The court emphasized the importance of timely responses and adherence to procedural rules in adjudication proceedings, ultimately ruling against the petitioner. en-us Wed, 09 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Nov 2013 11:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238860 The court dismissed the writ petition seeking the release of cash seized by Central Excise Authorities, citing the petitioner's delays, failure to comply with procedural requirements, and absence before the Adjudicating Authority as key reasons for the decision. Despite the Commissioner not rejecting the cash release application, the court declined to intervene due to the petitioner's prolonged inaction and non-filing of a reply to the show cause notice issued in 2008. The court emphasized the importance of timely responses and adherence to procedural rules in adjudication proceedings, ultimately ruling against the petitioner. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 09 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238860