<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 19 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238842</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the assessment was time-barred under Section 158BC of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It clarified that the limitation period recommenced from the date of vacation of the interim order, not from the date of communication, emphasizing the statutory provisions over High Court Rules in income tax proceedings. The judgment highlighted the importance of adhering to limitation periods and the impact of court orders on such timelines, ultimately dismissing the income tax appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 06:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 19 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238842</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the assessment was time-barred under Section 158BC of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It clarified that the limitation period recommenced from the date of vacation of the interim order, not from the date of communication, emphasizing the statutory provisions over High Court Rules in income tax proceedings. The judgment highlighted the importance of adhering to limitation periods and the impact of court orders on such timelines, ultimately dismissing the income tax appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>