<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 10 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238833</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for both assessment years, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s orders on all issues. The judgment emphasized the necessity of substantial evidence and proper verification by the assessing officer before making additions under Section 68 and other related provisions of the I.T. Act. The Tribunal&#039;s decision reinforced the principle that additions cannot be based on mere suspicion or conjecture without credible evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 05:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 10 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238833</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for both assessment years, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s orders on all issues. The judgment emphasized the necessity of substantial evidence and proper verification by the assessing officer before making additions under Section 68 and other related provisions of the I.T. Act. The Tribunal&#039;s decision reinforced the principle that additions cannot be based on mere suspicion or conjecture without credible evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>