<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 878 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158584</link>
    <description>Section 7-A of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 was treated as an independent charging and remedial provision designed to prevent leakage of tax where goods, though otherwise taxable, do not suffer tax because of exemption or other statutory reasons and are later consumed or otherwise rendered unavailable for taxation in the State. An exemption relating to the sale of coconuts and copra did not extend to the assessee&#039;s purchase liability, and an exemption notification for purchases by persons other than oil millers did not exclude Section 7-A where its conditions were met. The earlier precedent relied on concerned sale, not purchase, and was therefore inapplicable. The oil miller was liable to purchase tax and the contrary view was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 08:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334050" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 878 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158584</link>
      <description>Section 7-A of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 was treated as an independent charging and remedial provision designed to prevent leakage of tax where goods, though otherwise taxable, do not suffer tax because of exemption or other statutory reasons and are later consumed or otherwise rendered unavailable for taxation in the State. An exemption relating to the sale of coconuts and copra did not extend to the assessee&#039;s purchase liability, and an exemption notification for purchases by persons other than oil millers did not exclude Section 7-A where its conditions were met. The earlier precedent relied on concerned sale, not purchase, and was therefore inapplicable. The oil miller was liable to purchase tax and the contrary view was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>