<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (6) TMI 245 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158570</link>
    <description>An eligibility certificate under an incentive notification cannot be refused on the basis of irregularities confined to a later period when the relevant books and transactions for the claimed period show no defect. The authority must assess compliance by reference to the period for which the certificate is sought, and later events cannot justify refusal for an earlier period. A certificate also cannot be denied on a bare finding of non-viability unless there is a specific breach of the notification or an act or omission by the assessee that adversely affected the unit&#039;s economic viability. The rejection was therefore unsustainable and the certificate was directed to be granted for the relevant period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:27:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (6) TMI 245 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158570</link>
      <description>An eligibility certificate under an incentive notification cannot be refused on the basis of irregularities confined to a later period when the relevant books and transactions for the claimed period show no defect. The authority must assess compliance by reference to the period for which the certificate is sought, and later events cannot justify refusal for an earlier period. A certificate also cannot be denied on a bare finding of non-viability unless there is a specific breach of the notification or an act or omission by the assessee that adversely affected the unit&#039;s economic viability. The rejection was therefore unsustainable and the certificate was directed to be granted for the relevant period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>