<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (1) TMI 368 - MADRAS HIGH COURT]</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158568</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 12(5)(iii) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act was held not exigible where the assessee filed a revised return before completion of assessment. The Court followed its consistent view that a revised return submitted before assessment is completed does not attract that penalty. On those facts, the Tribunal&#039;s cancellation of the penalty was upheld, and the revision failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:20:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (1) TMI 368 - MADRAS HIGH COURT]</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158568</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 12(5)(iii) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act was held not exigible where the assessee filed a revised return before completion of assessment. The Court followed its consistent view that a revised return submitted before assessment is completed does not attract that penalty. On those facts, the Tribunal&#039;s cancellation of the penalty was upheld, and the revision failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>