<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1273 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238818</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the appellant liable for retaining collected service tax and not filing returns, justifying the penalties under sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. However, recognizing the timely tax payment post-detection, the Tribunal directed the appellant to pay a reduced 25% penalty within 30 days to discharge the penalty under section 78. The penalty under section 77 was upheld, partially allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1273 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238818</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the appellant liable for retaining collected service tax and not filing returns, justifying the penalties under sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. However, recognizing the timely tax payment post-detection, the Tribunal directed the appellant to pay a reduced 25% penalty within 30 days to discharge the penalty under section 78. The penalty under section 77 was upheld, partially allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>